Proven Human Capital Management Solutions

Proven Human Capital Management Solutions

Proven Human Capital Management Solutions

We handle payroll, benefits, compliance and risk so you can focus on your business.

We handle payroll, benefits,

compliance and risk. You can focus on your business.

We handle payroll, benefits, compliance and risk so you can focus on your business.

Solutions Overview

HR Solutions That Work

Supporting clients with the services they need to succeed.

Partner for Growth

Why Outsource with C2

Businesses that outsource HR grow faster, achieve higher profitability, experience lower turnover, and foster happier employees. Stay focused on your business.

C2 will, too.

0
0

%

Clients Would Recommend

0
0

%

Increased
Profitability

0
0

%

Increase In Revenue

0
0

%

Lower Failure Rate

0
0

%

Improved
Retention

0
0

%

Costs

Savings

c2 connection

One Platform for All HR Needs

Your control center for HR, payroll, benefits, and compliance.

Home

Employment verification

Schedule

Payroll

Pay checks

Paid time off

PTO calculator

A task list on a sky background shows five items; two are "Completed," three are "Incomplete." "Forms are ready for E-sign" for "James Smith" with 4 days left.
Schedule
Carousel image
Carousel image
Carousel image
Carousel image
Carousel image
Carousel image

HR models

Choose the HR Model That
Fits Your Business

Choose the HR Model That Fits Your Business

Whether you need full-service co-employment or flexible admin support,
C2 offers the model that fits your growth stage and compliance needs.

Whether you need full-service co-employment or flexible admin support, C2 offers the model that fits your growth stage and compliance needs.

PEO - Professional Employer Organization

PEO Support — Make C2 Your Employer of Record

Let C2 become your Employer of Record so you can share liability, simplify HR, and access big-company benefits.

What’s Included:

Employer of Record: C2

Shared liability protection

Large-group health, dental, vision, and retirement benefits

Payroll & tax administration

Recruiting & HR support

ASO – Administrative Services Organization

PEO - Professional Employer Organization

PEO Support — Make C2 Your Employer of Record

Let C2 become your Employer of Record so you can share liability, simplify HR, and access big-company benefits.

What’s Included:

Employer of Record: C2

Shared liability protection

Large-group health, dental, vision, and retirement benefits

Payroll & tax administration

Recruiting & HR support

ASO – Administrative Services Organization

Proof & Trust

Trusted by Businesses Nationwide

“C2 helped us capture new contracts and scale our organization not only through its robust HR services, but especially because of its expertise in the government contracting space.”

James Smith, CEO

0
0
0

+

+

+

Clients

Clients

0
0
0

+

+

+

Years in business

Years in business

0
0
0

+

+

+

Happy users

Happy users

0
0
0

States serviced

States serviced

0
0
0

+

+

+

Countries serviced

Countries serviced

0
0
0

%

%

%

Federal contractor client base

Federal contractor client base

Proof & Trust

Trusted by Businesses Nationwide

“C2 helped us capture new contracts and scale our organization not only through its robust HR services, but especially because of its expertise in the government contracting space.”

James Smith - CEO

0

+

Clients

0

+

Years in business

0

+

Happy users

0

States serviced

0

+

Countries serviced

0

%

Federal contractor client base

Blog

Stay Ahead of HR Trends

DOJ Increases Focus on Federal Contract Fraud 

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced new national fraud enforcement priorities that may be particularly relevant to federal government contractors. In a memorandum, DOJ identified government procurement fraud as a critical enforcement priority and outlined an increased focus on fraud involving government contracts and taxpayer-funded programs. 


The Department's new National Fraud Detection Center brings together prosecutors, law enforcement agencies, data analysts, and subject-matter experts and uses advanced data analytics to identify potential fraud and develop investigative leads. 


The DOJ identified several areas for increased enforcement attention, including defective pricing, bid rigging, self-dealing, bribery, product substitution, and billing fraud. DOJ also plans to use increased data analytics and coordination among federal enforcement agencies to identify and investigate potential fraud. 

Existing Contractor Requirements Remain Important 

The DOJ announcement does not create a new general compliance requirement for all government contractors. Many of the applicable ethics and disclosure obligations have been part of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) for years. 


For example, FAR 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, applies to certain covered federal contracts and requires contractors to maintain a written code of business ethics and conduct and establish appropriate measures to prevent and detect criminal conduct.  Under the current FAR, the clause is generally included in contracts expected to exceed $7.5 million with a performance period of 120 days or more.  


Covered contractors also have requirements related to internal reporting, training, internal controls, and disclosure of certain credible evidence of misconduct. The increased DOJ enforcement focus provides a good reason for government contractors to review whether their existing compliance processes are current and functioning as intended. 

How Issues May Be Identified 

Government contractors should be aware that potential compliance issues may be identified through employee or former-employee reports, government audits, agency Inspectors General, contracting officials, whistleblower lawsuits, or increasingly through data analytics that identify unusual patterns in government contracting and payment data. 


The government's own description is that it is trying to connect information that previously existed in separate systems and use analytics to generate investigative leads.   


If the government identifies potential misconduct, the contractor may face an investigation, audit, civil or criminal enforcement action, repayment or settlement obligations, and, in serious cases, suspension or debarment from federal contracting. A typical progression can look like this: 


  1. Initial inquiry/investigation. DOJ, an agency Inspector General, or another government agency may request records, interview employees, or investigate the allegation. In False Claims Act matters, DOJ has authority to issue a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) seeking documents, written answers, and/or oral testimony.  


  1. Internal investigation and cooperation. If FAR 52.203-13 applies, the contractor has obligations concerning cooperation with government audits/investigations. The clause also expressly preserves the contractor's ability to conduct its own internal investigation and defend a proceeding.  


  1. Civil settlement or recovery. If the government concludes that the contractor improperly billed or made false claims, the matter can result in repayment, penalties, or a negotiated settlement. The dollar amounts can be substantially larger than the underlying improper payment.  


  1. Criminal prosecution. If the evidence supports criminal conduct, DOJ can pursue criminal charges against the company and/or individuals.  


  1. Contract consequences. Depending on the circumstances, the contractor can face contract remedies, including termination, withholding/recovery of payments, or other administrative action.  


  1. Suspension or debarment. This is potentially the most significant contractor consequence. FAR permits suspension when there is adequate evidence of certain misconduct, including fraud or criminal conduct relating to a government contract. Suspension is temporary and generally remains in effect while an investigation or legal proceeding is pending.  


Recent Enforcement Examples 

Recent DOJ enforcement actions demonstrate the types of issues that can create significant exposure for government contractors: 




Compliance Area 



DOJ Enforcement 



HR/Compliance Takeaway 



Labor charging 



March 2026 – Hanford Mission Integration Solutions (HMIS): HMIS agreed to pay $3.45 million to resolve allegations that it overcharged the Department of Energy for labor hours. DOJ said management was aware of and failed to prevent inflated labor hours, including employees recording time for work they had not been assigned. The settlement included $1.725 million in restitution and followed whistleblower allegations from an employee. 



Accurate timekeeping, labor charging, work assignments, and manager oversight are important controls for contractors, particularly those performing cost-reimbursement work. 



Cybersecurity requirements 



September 2026 – Honeywell Aerospace: Honeywell agreed to pay $2.04 million to resolve allegations that it submitted claims for payment while failing to comply with NIST SP 800-171 cybersecurity requirements incorporated into a Department of Defense contract. The matter arose from a False Claims Act lawsuit filed by a former employee, who will receive approximately $375,823 from the settlement. 



Employees who handle government information should understand applicable cybersecurity requirements and know how to report concerns. Contractors should maintain appropriate channels for current and former employees to raise potential compliance concerns. 



Organizational conflicts of interest 



July 2026 – Sierra Nevada Company: Sierra Nevada agreed to pay $7.75 million to resolve False Claims Act allegations involving its employment of a government employee who continued participating in contracts involving the company. DOJ alleged that the arrangement created an organizational conflict of interest and that the company made false statements and certifications concerning the conflict. 



Hiring or employing current or former government personnel can create compliance considerations. Contractors should have a process for identifying and escalating potential conflicts before an individual participates in contract-related activities. 



Small-business and SDVOSB requirements 



June 2026 – Broadway Electric and Cornerstone Contracting: The companies and two executives agreed to pay $21.3 million to resolve allegations involving the improper use of federal contracts reserved for service-disabled veteran-owned and other eligible small businesses. DOJ alleged improper control over staffing, performance, and financial administration of purported qualifying businesses. 



Contractors participating in set-aside programs should periodically verify that ownership, control, staffing, performance, and other representations remain accurate. 



Contractor kickbacks 



July 2026 – Mark 1 Restoration Company: Mark 1 and its owner agreed to a $7.26 million resolution of civil claims involving alleged kickbacks paid to an Amtrak official to obtain favorable changes to a government contract. The owner and several executives had previously pleaded guilty to related criminal charges. 



Contractors should ensure employees and managers understand restrictions concerning gifts, gratuities, kickbacks, conflicts of interest, and interactions with government officials. 


These cases illustrate that government-contract enforcement can involve timekeeping and labor charging, cybersecurity, conflicts of interest, small-business eligibility, procurement practices, billing, and employee reporting. They also demonstrate that issues can be identified through employees, former employees, agency inspectors general, and other government enforcement resources. 

What Government Contractors Should Review 

Contractors should consider the following: 

  • Don’t just have policies on paper. Make sure employees know the rules, managers understand their responsibilities, time and billing records are accurate, and there is a functioning process for reporting and escalating concerns—including a confidential or anonymous reporting option. 


  • Review applicable contracts. Determine whether FAR 52.203-13 or other agency-specific ethics and disclosure requirements apply to current contracts or subcontracts. 


  • Review the code of conduct. Confirm that the company's business ethics and conduct policy is current and accessible to employees. 


  • Confirm reporting procedures. Employees should know how to report suspected fraud, conflicts of interest, bribery, improper billing, or other potential misconduct. 


  • Review training requirements. Confirm that employees and other covered individuals receive required ethics and compliance training. 


  • Review internal controls. Pay particular attention to controls involving government billing, labor charging and timekeeping, pricing, procurement, subcontractors, cybersecurity, and contract deliverables. 


  • Reinforce non-retaliation expectations. Employees should be able to raise concerns through established reporting channels without fear of retaliation. 


  • Review escalation procedures. Managers should know where to direct concerns involving potential government-contract misconduct rather than attempting to resolve significant allegations independently. 


  • Review disclosure procedures. Make sure the company has a process for promptly involving the appropriate compliance and legal resources when potential misconduct may trigger a contractual or legal disclosure obligation. 


  • Document corrective action. Where concerns are substantiated, companies should document appropriate corrective and remedial measures consistent with their policies and contractual requirements. 


Government Resources 

  • U.S. Department of Justice – Fraud Section: https://www.justice.gov/fraud 


  • DOJ – Fraud Division Policies and Guidance: https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-fraud/policy-materials 


  • Acquisition.gov – FAR 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct:  https://www.acquisition.gov/far/52.203-13 


  • Acquisition.gov – FAR Subpart 3.10, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct:  https://www.acquisition.gov/far/subpart-3.10 


  • Acquisition.gov – FAR 3.1003, Requirements for Government Contractors:  https://www.acquisition.gov/far/3.1003 

Read more

DOJ Increases Focus on Federal Contract Fraud 

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced new national fraud enforcement priorities that may be particularly relevant to federal government contractors. In a memorandum, DOJ identified government procurement fraud as a critical enforcement priority and outlined an increased focus on fraud involving government contracts and taxpayer-funded programs. 


The Department's new National Fraud Detection Center brings together prosecutors, law enforcement agencies, data analysts, and subject-matter experts and uses advanced data analytics to identify potential fraud and develop investigative leads. 


The DOJ identified several areas for increased enforcement attention, including defective pricing, bid rigging, self-dealing, bribery, product substitution, and billing fraud. DOJ also plans to use increased data analytics and coordination among federal enforcement agencies to identify and investigate potential fraud. 

Existing Contractor Requirements Remain Important 

The DOJ announcement does not create a new general compliance requirement for all government contractors. Many of the applicable ethics and disclosure obligations have been part of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) for years. 


For example, FAR 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, applies to certain covered federal contracts and requires contractors to maintain a written code of business ethics and conduct and establish appropriate measures to prevent and detect criminal conduct.  Under the current FAR, the clause is generally included in contracts expected to exceed $7.5 million with a performance period of 120 days or more.  


Covered contractors also have requirements related to internal reporting, training, internal controls, and disclosure of certain credible evidence of misconduct. The increased DOJ enforcement focus provides a good reason for government contractors to review whether their existing compliance processes are current and functioning as intended. 

How Issues May Be Identified 

Government contractors should be aware that potential compliance issues may be identified through employee or former-employee reports, government audits, agency Inspectors General, contracting officials, whistleblower lawsuits, or increasingly through data analytics that identify unusual patterns in government contracting and payment data. 


The government's own description is that it is trying to connect information that previously existed in separate systems and use analytics to generate investigative leads.   


If the government identifies potential misconduct, the contractor may face an investigation, audit, civil or criminal enforcement action, repayment or settlement obligations, and, in serious cases, suspension or debarment from federal contracting. A typical progression can look like this: 


  1. Initial inquiry/investigation. DOJ, an agency Inspector General, or another government agency may request records, interview employees, or investigate the allegation. In False Claims Act matters, DOJ has authority to issue a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) seeking documents, written answers, and/or oral testimony.  


  1. Internal investigation and cooperation. If FAR 52.203-13 applies, the contractor has obligations concerning cooperation with government audits/investigations. The clause also expressly preserves the contractor's ability to conduct its own internal investigation and defend a proceeding.  


  1. Civil settlement or recovery. If the government concludes that the contractor improperly billed or made false claims, the matter can result in repayment, penalties, or a negotiated settlement. The dollar amounts can be substantially larger than the underlying improper payment.  


  1. Criminal prosecution. If the evidence supports criminal conduct, DOJ can pursue criminal charges against the company and/or individuals.  


  1. Contract consequences. Depending on the circumstances, the contractor can face contract remedies, including termination, withholding/recovery of payments, or other administrative action.  


  1. Suspension or debarment. This is potentially the most significant contractor consequence. FAR permits suspension when there is adequate evidence of certain misconduct, including fraud or criminal conduct relating to a government contract. Suspension is temporary and generally remains in effect while an investigation or legal proceeding is pending.  


Recent Enforcement Examples 

Recent DOJ enforcement actions demonstrate the types of issues that can create significant exposure for government contractors: 




Compliance Area 



DOJ Enforcement 



HR/Compliance Takeaway 



Labor charging 



March 2026 – Hanford Mission Integration Solutions (HMIS): HMIS agreed to pay $3.45 million to resolve allegations that it overcharged the Department of Energy for labor hours. DOJ said management was aware of and failed to prevent inflated labor hours, including employees recording time for work they had not been assigned. The settlement included $1.725 million in restitution and followed whistleblower allegations from an employee. 



Accurate timekeeping, labor charging, work assignments, and manager oversight are important controls for contractors, particularly those performing cost-reimbursement work. 



Cybersecurity requirements 



September 2026 – Honeywell Aerospace: Honeywell agreed to pay $2.04 million to resolve allegations that it submitted claims for payment while failing to comply with NIST SP 800-171 cybersecurity requirements incorporated into a Department of Defense contract. The matter arose from a False Claims Act lawsuit filed by a former employee, who will receive approximately $375,823 from the settlement. 



Employees who handle government information should understand applicable cybersecurity requirements and know how to report concerns. Contractors should maintain appropriate channels for current and former employees to raise potential compliance concerns. 



Organizational conflicts of interest 



July 2026 – Sierra Nevada Company: Sierra Nevada agreed to pay $7.75 million to resolve False Claims Act allegations involving its employment of a government employee who continued participating in contracts involving the company. DOJ alleged that the arrangement created an organizational conflict of interest and that the company made false statements and certifications concerning the conflict. 



Hiring or employing current or former government personnel can create compliance considerations. Contractors should have a process for identifying and escalating potential conflicts before an individual participates in contract-related activities. 



Small-business and SDVOSB requirements 



June 2026 – Broadway Electric and Cornerstone Contracting: The companies and two executives agreed to pay $21.3 million to resolve allegations involving the improper use of federal contracts reserved for service-disabled veteran-owned and other eligible small businesses. DOJ alleged improper control over staffing, performance, and financial administration of purported qualifying businesses. 



Contractors participating in set-aside programs should periodically verify that ownership, control, staffing, performance, and other representations remain accurate. 



Contractor kickbacks 



July 2026 – Mark 1 Restoration Company: Mark 1 and its owner agreed to a $7.26 million resolution of civil claims involving alleged kickbacks paid to an Amtrak official to obtain favorable changes to a government contract. The owner and several executives had previously pleaded guilty to related criminal charges. 



Contractors should ensure employees and managers understand restrictions concerning gifts, gratuities, kickbacks, conflicts of interest, and interactions with government officials. 


These cases illustrate that government-contract enforcement can involve timekeeping and labor charging, cybersecurity, conflicts of interest, small-business eligibility, procurement practices, billing, and employee reporting. They also demonstrate that issues can be identified through employees, former employees, agency inspectors general, and other government enforcement resources. 

What Government Contractors Should Review 

Contractors should consider the following: 

  • Don’t just have policies on paper. Make sure employees know the rules, managers understand their responsibilities, time and billing records are accurate, and there is a functioning process for reporting and escalating concerns—including a confidential or anonymous reporting option. 


  • Review applicable contracts. Determine whether FAR 52.203-13 or other agency-specific ethics and disclosure requirements apply to current contracts or subcontracts. 


  • Review the code of conduct. Confirm that the company's business ethics and conduct policy is current and accessible to employees. 


  • Confirm reporting procedures. Employees should know how to report suspected fraud, conflicts of interest, bribery, improper billing, or other potential misconduct. 


  • Review training requirements. Confirm that employees and other covered individuals receive required ethics and compliance training. 


  • Review internal controls. Pay particular attention to controls involving government billing, labor charging and timekeeping, pricing, procurement, subcontractors, cybersecurity, and contract deliverables. 


  • Reinforce non-retaliation expectations. Employees should be able to raise concerns through established reporting channels without fear of retaliation. 


  • Review escalation procedures. Managers should know where to direct concerns involving potential government-contract misconduct rather than attempting to resolve significant allegations independently. 


  • Review disclosure procedures. Make sure the company has a process for promptly involving the appropriate compliance and legal resources when potential misconduct may trigger a contractual or legal disclosure obligation. 


  • Document corrective action. Where concerns are substantiated, companies should document appropriate corrective and remedial measures consistent with their policies and contractual requirements. 


Government Resources 

  • U.S. Department of Justice – Fraud Section: https://www.justice.gov/fraud 


  • DOJ – Fraud Division Policies and Guidance: https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-fraud/policy-materials 


  • Acquisition.gov – FAR 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct:  https://www.acquisition.gov/far/52.203-13 


  • Acquisition.gov – FAR Subpart 3.10, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct:  https://www.acquisition.gov/far/subpart-3.10 


  • Acquisition.gov – FAR 3.1003, Requirements for Government Contractors:  https://www.acquisition.gov/far/3.1003 

Read more

Futuristic quantum computing microchip on circuit board representing advanced technology

Quantum Computing: Why Government Contractors Should Be Paying Attention 

Quantum computing may sound like a technology reserved for scientists and large technology companies, but recent federal investments suggest it is becoming increasingly relevant to the government contracting community. 


The latest development: IBM has finalized a $1 billion award from the U.S. Department of Commerce to support research and development at a new U.S.-based quantum chip foundry. The facility, known as Anderon, is being developed to manufacture specialized quantum computing wafers and help expand the domestic quantum technology supply chain. 


The IBM announcement is part of a much larger federal effort. In May 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced $2.013 billion in planned CHIPS and Science Act incentives for nine companies across the quantum computing and manufacturing ecosystem, including IBM, GlobalFoundries, D-Wave, Quantinuum, PsiQuantum and other emerging quantum technology companies. 

First, What Exactly Is Quantum Computing? 

In simple terms, a quantum computer is a fundamentally different type of computer. Today's computers process information using bits, which represent either a 0 or a 1. Quantum computers use qubits, which can take advantage of unusual properties of quantum physics to process certain types of problems in ways that conventional computers cannot.


That does not mean a quantum computer will replace the laptop or server sitting on your desk. Instead, quantum computers are being developed to tackle certain extremely complicated problems—such as modeling molecules and materials, optimizing complex systems and addressing some problems in cryptography—that could be difficult or impractical for conventional computers.


The technology is still developing, and significant technical challenges remain. But the federal government is treating quantum computing as an important emerging technology with potential national security and economic implications. 

What Does This Mean for Government Contractors? 

For government contractors, the opportunity may not be in building a quantum computer. Instead, opportunities could develop throughout the supporting ecosystem. As federal investment grows, contractors with capabilities in areas such as cybersecurity, software development, engineering, testing, advanced manufacturing, cloud computing, data analytics, systems integration and technical consulting may find opportunities to support larger prime contractors, research organizations and federal agencies. 


For example, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) continues to actively engage industry on quantum technology.  Its Quantum Benchmarking Initiative is examining approaches to developing utility-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computing, including independent verification and validation. DARPA specifically encourages participation from traditional defense contractors, corporations and startups, and maintains resources for small businesses interested in its programs. 


For contractors looking for potential business-development opportunities, this makes quantum technology worth monitoring—not necessarily because every company needs to become a quantum computing company, but because new technology programs often create requirements for a much broader network of supporting contractors and suppliers. 


DARPA is a U.S. Department of Defense agency that funds and manages high-risk, high-payoff research intended to develop technologies that could provide major advantages for national security. For government contractors, DARPA is relevant because it works directly with industry, universities, startups, and research organizations to develop emerging technologies. 

There Is Also a Cybersecurity Side to the Story 

Quantum computing presents an opportunity, but it also creates a cybersecurity issue that government contractors should understand. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could eventually threaten some of the encryption methods currently used to protect sensitive information. This is why the federal government and cybersecurity community are already working on post-quantum cryptography (PQC)—security methods designed to withstand attacks from future quantum computers. 


National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has already finalized three federal post-quantum cryptography standards and is encouraging organizations to begin transitioning to quantum-resistant technology. NIST notes that the transition can take years because organizations must identify where vulnerable cryptography is being used and update systems, products and services accordingly. 


For government contractors, this is an important distinction: you do not need to operate a quantum computer for quantum technology to affect your business. 


Contractors that maintain federal systems, develop software, manage sensitive information or provide cybersecurity services may eventually need to address quantum-resistant encryption as part of their technology and security planning. 


What Should Contractors Do Now? 

There is no need for most small and midsize contractors to make major investments in quantum computing today. A more practical approach is to begin monitoring the technology and understanding where it could intersect with your business. Consider: 


  • Monitor federal opportunities. Watch agencies such as DARPA, NIST, NSF and the Department of Defense for quantum-related solicitations, research programs and technology-transition opportunities. 


  • Look beyond the prime contract. Quantum initiatives will require suppliers, cybersecurity companies, engineers, software developers, testing organizations and other specialized service providers. 


  • Talk with your technology partners. Ask whether the systems and products you rely on have a plan for transitioning to post-quantum cryptography. 


  • Assess long-term data protection. Information that must remain confidential for many years may warrant particular attention to emerging quantum-related risks. 


  • Build awareness internally. Even if quantum computing is not part of your current contract portfolio, understanding the technology can help identify future teaming and subcontracting opportunities. 


The federal government's growing investment in quantum computing signals that the technology is moving from primarily academic research toward a broader national technology and industrial strategy. For government contractors, the takeaway is not that quantum computing is about to transform every federal program.


Rather, the supporting ecosystem is beginning to take shape—and contractors that understand where their existing capabilities fit may be better positioned to recognize opportunities as they emerge. The quantum era is still developing. But for companies serving the federal government, it is a technology worth having on the radar now. 


Resources for government contractors include: 


  • DARPA Industry Opportunities: DARPA provides information on current opportunities, including Broad Agency Announcements, Requests for Proposals and Requests for Information, as well as resources for small businesses. 


  • DARPA Quantum Benchmarking Initiative: Current quantum-related research and technology-development opportunities can be monitored through DARPA's Quantum Benchmarking Initiative. The initiative is examining whether utility-scale quantum computing can become practical and is currently soliciting participation in several areas. 


  • NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography: NIST's resources explain the new quantum-resistant cryptography standards and provide guidance for organizations planning their transition. NIST recommends that organizations begin preparing for migration to post-quantum cryptography. 


  • National Quantum Initiative: Quantum.gov provides information on federal quantum research, programs and initiatives across the government, including activities involving quantum computing, networking and sensing. 

Read more

Futuristic quantum computing microchip on circuit board representing advanced technology

Quantum Computing: Why Government Contractors Should Be Paying Attention 

Quantum computing may sound like a technology reserved for scientists and large technology companies, but recent federal investments suggest it is becoming increasingly relevant to the government contracting community. 


The latest development: IBM has finalized a $1 billion award from the U.S. Department of Commerce to support research and development at a new U.S.-based quantum chip foundry. The facility, known as Anderon, is being developed to manufacture specialized quantum computing wafers and help expand the domestic quantum technology supply chain. 


The IBM announcement is part of a much larger federal effort. In May 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced $2.013 billion in planned CHIPS and Science Act incentives for nine companies across the quantum computing and manufacturing ecosystem, including IBM, GlobalFoundries, D-Wave, Quantinuum, PsiQuantum and other emerging quantum technology companies. 

First, What Exactly Is Quantum Computing? 

In simple terms, a quantum computer is a fundamentally different type of computer. Today's computers process information using bits, which represent either a 0 or a 1. Quantum computers use qubits, which can take advantage of unusual properties of quantum physics to process certain types of problems in ways that conventional computers cannot.


That does not mean a quantum computer will replace the laptop or server sitting on your desk. Instead, quantum computers are being developed to tackle certain extremely complicated problems—such as modeling molecules and materials, optimizing complex systems and addressing some problems in cryptography—that could be difficult or impractical for conventional computers.


The technology is still developing, and significant technical challenges remain. But the federal government is treating quantum computing as an important emerging technology with potential national security and economic implications. 

What Does This Mean for Government Contractors? 

For government contractors, the opportunity may not be in building a quantum computer. Instead, opportunities could develop throughout the supporting ecosystem. As federal investment grows, contractors with capabilities in areas such as cybersecurity, software development, engineering, testing, advanced manufacturing, cloud computing, data analytics, systems integration and technical consulting may find opportunities to support larger prime contractors, research organizations and federal agencies. 


For example, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) continues to actively engage industry on quantum technology.  Its Quantum Benchmarking Initiative is examining approaches to developing utility-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computing, including independent verification and validation. DARPA specifically encourages participation from traditional defense contractors, corporations and startups, and maintains resources for small businesses interested in its programs. 


For contractors looking for potential business-development opportunities, this makes quantum technology worth monitoring—not necessarily because every company needs to become a quantum computing company, but because new technology programs often create requirements for a much broader network of supporting contractors and suppliers. 


DARPA is a U.S. Department of Defense agency that funds and manages high-risk, high-payoff research intended to develop technologies that could provide major advantages for national security. For government contractors, DARPA is relevant because it works directly with industry, universities, startups, and research organizations to develop emerging technologies. 

There Is Also a Cybersecurity Side to the Story 

Quantum computing presents an opportunity, but it also creates a cybersecurity issue that government contractors should understand. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could eventually threaten some of the encryption methods currently used to protect sensitive information. This is why the federal government and cybersecurity community are already working on post-quantum cryptography (PQC)—security methods designed to withstand attacks from future quantum computers. 


National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has already finalized three federal post-quantum cryptography standards and is encouraging organizations to begin transitioning to quantum-resistant technology. NIST notes that the transition can take years because organizations must identify where vulnerable cryptography is being used and update systems, products and services accordingly. 


For government contractors, this is an important distinction: you do not need to operate a quantum computer for quantum technology to affect your business. 


Contractors that maintain federal systems, develop software, manage sensitive information or provide cybersecurity services may eventually need to address quantum-resistant encryption as part of their technology and security planning. 


What Should Contractors Do Now? 

There is no need for most small and midsize contractors to make major investments in quantum computing today. A more practical approach is to begin monitoring the technology and understanding where it could intersect with your business. Consider: 


  • Monitor federal opportunities. Watch agencies such as DARPA, NIST, NSF and the Department of Defense for quantum-related solicitations, research programs and technology-transition opportunities. 


  • Look beyond the prime contract. Quantum initiatives will require suppliers, cybersecurity companies, engineers, software developers, testing organizations and other specialized service providers. 


  • Talk with your technology partners. Ask whether the systems and products you rely on have a plan for transitioning to post-quantum cryptography. 


  • Assess long-term data protection. Information that must remain confidential for many years may warrant particular attention to emerging quantum-related risks. 


  • Build awareness internally. Even if quantum computing is not part of your current contract portfolio, understanding the technology can help identify future teaming and subcontracting opportunities. 


The federal government's growing investment in quantum computing signals that the technology is moving from primarily academic research toward a broader national technology and industrial strategy. For government contractors, the takeaway is not that quantum computing is about to transform every federal program.


Rather, the supporting ecosystem is beginning to take shape—and contractors that understand where their existing capabilities fit may be better positioned to recognize opportunities as they emerge. The quantum era is still developing. But for companies serving the federal government, it is a technology worth having on the radar now. 


Resources for government contractors include: 


  • DARPA Industry Opportunities: DARPA provides information on current opportunities, including Broad Agency Announcements, Requests for Proposals and Requests for Information, as well as resources for small businesses. 


  • DARPA Quantum Benchmarking Initiative: Current quantum-related research and technology-development opportunities can be monitored through DARPA's Quantum Benchmarking Initiative. The initiative is examining whether utility-scale quantum computing can become practical and is currently soliciting participation in several areas. 


  • NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography: NIST's resources explain the new quantum-resistant cryptography standards and provide guidance for organizations planning their transition. NIST recommends that organizations begin preparing for migration to post-quantum cryptography. 


  • National Quantum Initiative: Quantum.gov provides information on federal quantum research, programs and initiatives across the government, including activities involving quantum computing, networking and sensing. 

Read more

What a Shark, a Comedian and a Nobel Laureate Taught Me About Breaking Barriers

When people talk about breaking the glass ceiling, they often focus on the moment someone finally breaks through. The promotion. The title. The company. The accomplishment. What we don't talk about enough are all the moments that come before it. 


The moments when you're told you aren't qualified enough. When you're the only woman in the room. When someone speaks over you. When you're underestimated. When you watch an opportunity go to someone else because you don't have the right degree or background. When you begin wondering whether the things that make you different are going to keep you from becoming the person you know you can be. I know those moments because I lived them. 


And when I think about Women's Equality Day, I think not only about my own journey, but about the women whose stories have influenced me along the way. Some came before me. Some built their careers alongside my generation. And one is young enough to remind me that inspiration and mentorship don't always come from those who are older than us. They are entrepreneurs, journalists, entertainers, executives and advocates. Their lives could hardly be more different. 


But every one of them encountered a ceiling that told her, in one way or another, this is as far as you are supposed to go. And every one of them kept going and so did I. 

The Girl Hiding Behind the Door 

I grew up in a military family without much money. My father's career as an Army Infantry officer meant our family moved around the world, usually every few years. I was born in Georgia while he was stationed at Fort Benning, and moving became a normal part of childhood. 


Long before I knew what adaptability meant in business, I learned it through life. New schools. New communities. New countries. New people. Every few years, I had to learn how to walk into an unfamiliar environment and find my place. That ability to adapt would eventually become one of my greatest strengths in business. 


But there was another part of my childhood that took much longer to understand. School was difficult for me. This was during a time when children who learned differently weren't necessarily given the understanding or resources available today. I struggled academically and was separated from the other students and sent to another classroom. 


I remember being so embarrassed about being placed with the "slow kids" that I would hide behind the door because I didn't want the other children to see that I was in there. Think about what that teaches a little girl. Before you even understand why you're different, you begin believing that being different is something you should hide. 


For years, I didn't have an explanation for why certain things were harder for me. I simply believed I wasn't as good at them as everyone else. It wasn't until I was around 30, after a family member was diagnosed with dyslexia, that I decided to be evaluated myself. I was dyslexic. Suddenly, so much of my childhood made sense. But something else had happened during all those years when I didn't know. 


I adapted. I learned how to compensate for the things that were difficult by becoming exceptionally good at other things. I learned to remember information. I learned to read people. I learned to communicate. I learned to build relationships. I learned how to understand what someone needed, sometimes before they knew how to articulate it themselves. The thing I had once believed was holding me back had forced me to develop some of the exact abilities that would eventually make me successful in human resources and business. 

Barbara Corcoran: What School Couldn’t Measure 

That's one of the reasons I have always felt such a strong connection to Barbara Corcoran. 


Millions of people know Barbara today as one of the original investors on Shark Tank. They see a confident entrepreneur evaluating businesses and deciding which founders deserve her investment. But Barbara's story didn't begin in a boardroom. 


She has spoken openly about struggling academically because of dyslexia. She moved through numerous jobs as a young woman before eventually finding her place in real estate. With a $1,000 loan, Barbara started a tiny real estate company in New York City. That business eventually became The Corcoran Group, one of the best-known names in New York real estate. She would later sell the company and build another chapter of her career as an investor, author and television personality. 


What Barbara broke through wasn't simply the traditional glass ceiling facing women in business. She also broke through assumptions about what intelligence and potential are supposed to look like. For someone who grew up with dyslexia, that means something to me. When you struggle in school, it can be very easy to confuse learning differently with being less capable. I spent part of my childhood believing that. 


Barbara's story demonstrates the opposite. She figured out what she did exceptionally well and built around those strengths. So did I. Our careers and businesses are very different, but I recognize something in her journey. 


Neither of us followed the traditional roadmap people associate with becoming successful businesswomen. Neither of us allowed dyslexia to write the ending of our stories. And both of us ultimately built companies from very humble beginnings. 


Barbara broke a glass ceiling by proving that the girl who struggled in the classroom could eventually become the woman sitting on the other side of the table investing in other people's dreams. Sometimes the first ceiling you have to break is the one the world taught you to place over yourself. 

Finding the Work That Fit Me 

My career didn't follow a straight line either. I didn't complete college. I originally thought I might become a pediatric nurse because I loved children and helping people. But academics continued to be difficult, particularly in areas like math and chemistry, and eventually I changed direction. 


Like a lot of young people, I moved between possibilities before realizing where I belonged. That place was human resources. I had actually gotten an early glimpse of HR while my family was stationed in Germany. During a summer job in the Civilian Personnel Office, I watched a woman who genuinely loved helping people solve problems. I remember the joy she got from her work. People would walk in with problems, and she wanted to help fix them. I could see myself doing that. 


Eventually, I found my way back to HR professionally and into the government contracting world. And I discovered that I was good at it. I understood people. I built relationships. People trusted me. I could walk into different environments and adapt, something I had been practicing without realizing it since childhood. But being good at your job and being allowed to advance weren't always the same thing. I was told I was talented,  was told I did great work. But I was also told that because I didn't have a college degree, there were positions I couldn't reach. 


Then there was another reality. I was a woman building a career in the government contracting world of the late 1980s and early 1990s. It was overwhelmingly male. I knew what it felt like to be underestimated. I knew what it was like not to have a voice. I was ignored. I was talked over. I was excluded. 


There were rooms where you understood very quickly that some of the men around the table did not necessarily see you as their equal. I began to understand that there really was a glass ceiling above me. But there was another message I had grown up hearing that eventually became part of how I approached business and life: 


Failure is not an option. 


If someone else had already decided how high I was allowed to go, perhaps I needed to stop asking for permission to go higher. 

Barbara Walters: A Voice That Changed Who Got to Ask the Questions 

During those years, women like Barbara Walters mattered to me. Today, it is easy to turn on the television and see women anchoring major news programs, interviewing presidents and leading conversations about politics, culture and world events. 


That was not always the case. Barbara Walters built her career in an era when broadcast journalism, particularly its most prestigious positions, was overwhelmingly controlled by men. She began working behind the scenes in television before joining NBC's Today show in the early 1960s. Even as her role grew, women in television news were often expected to cover lighter stories while their male colleagues were given the most serious assignments.  


Barbara kept pushing beyond those expectations. She became the first female co-host of Today. Then, in 1976, she made television history when she joined ABC Evening News and became the first woman to co-anchor a network evening news program. Later, she became a longtime presence on 20/20 and, in 1997, created The View, building a program around women having direct, sometimes difficult conversations about the issues of the day. 


Over the course of her career, Barbara interviewed presidents, heads of state, celebrities and some of the most recognizable figures in the world. Her ability to secure important interviews became one of the defining characteristics of her career. But what I admired most wasn't simply who she interviewed. It was the authority she earned to ask the questions. For generations, the person sitting across from a president, a world leader or another powerful figure was usually a man. 


Barbara changed that image. She demonstrated that a woman could control the conversation. She could be persistent. She could challenge someone powerful. She could ask an uncomfortable question and wait for the answer. And she could do all of it without becoming someone else in order to be taken seriously. 


Most importantly to me, people trusted her. That was the part of Barbara's career that stayed with me. I was learning professionally that having something valuable to contribute didn't necessarily mean someone would automatically give me the opportunity to contribute it. Barbara's career demonstrated something different: authority doesn't always have to be given to you. Sometimes you build it until people can no longer ignore it. 


And she did more than break through for herself. By becoming the first woman to co-anchor   network evening newscast, she changed what millions of Americans saw when they imagined a person with authority. Later, with The View, she helped create a table specifically built around women having opinions, disagreeing, asking questions and shaping conversations themselves. There is something important about that progression. 


Early in our careers, so much of our energy can be spent trying to prove that we deserve a seat at someone else's table. Eventually, leadership becomes about creating a bigger table. Looking back, I think that is one of the lessons I took from Barbara without fully realizing it at the time. I was reaching a point in my own career where I had demonstrated what I could do. I knew I was good at my work. I knew I understood people. I knew I understood government contractors. And I was beginning to recognize an opportunity that other people weren't seeing.  


The question was whether I was going to continue waiting for someone else to decide what I was qualified to do. Or whether I was finally going to decide for myself. 

When I Stopped Waiting for Permission 

As my career progressed, I started noticing an opportunity. I was working in HR for government contractors and developing relationships throughout the federal contracting community. Small businesses were competing for significant government work, but many didn't have the internal infrastructure of the larger companies they were competing against. They needed sophisticated HR support, but many couldn't justify building entire HR departments. 


There was a gap. And I couldn't stop thinking about it. 


Eventually, I went to the Library of Congress to research an idea I genuinely thought I had invented. What if one organization could provide these businesses with the HR infrastructure and services they needed? Then I discovered something slightly humbling. I hadn't invented it. The PEO model already existed. But what I had identified was still important. The model wasn't being widely used to serve the Washington-area federal contracting community in the way I envisioned. So instead of being discouraged that someone had gotten there first, I started asking a different question: 


Why couldn't I be the one to bring it to the market I knew? 


In 1996, at 32 years old, I started C2. There was no beautiful corporate headquarters. There wasn't a large staff waiting for me. There wasn't a giant pool of investment capital. 


There was my townhouse. There was me. And there were my parents. 


My parents weren't wealthy investors. After my father retired from the military, they invested their retirement money into a chicken farm. When I needed funding to start my company, they took a loan against that farm and gave me $100,000. I agreed to repay every dollar with interest. 


I remember asking my father what would happen if I failed. The answer, underneath a joke about him and my mother having to walk chickens for the rest of their lives, was the same message he had taught me throughout my life. Failure wasn't an option. So I got to work. 


When I say I ran the company, I mean I ran the company. HR, payroll, accounting, sales, client relationships, research, and operations. If something needed to happen, there wasn't another department I could send it to, I was the department. 


Entrepreneurship looks very different when you're living through it than it does when someone tells the success story decades later. The beginning wasn't glamorous. It was long hours, uncertainty, responsibility, and knowing my parents had put their own financial security behind their belief in me. 


But slowly, the things I had imagined started becoming real. I hired my first employee. We added clients. We hired more people. And eventually, C2 had an office. I remember what that represented to me. I could physically walk through a door and see what all of those years of work had created. C2 wasn't an idea being run out of my basement anymore. It was a company. And one of the accomplishments that meant the most to me had nothing to do with an award or title. 


It was that I paid my parents back every dollar including the interest. 

Joan Rivers: Never Make Yourself Smaller  

As C2 grew, I faced a different challenge. Starting a company is one thing. Deciding what kind of leader you're going to become is another. That is one of the reasons I have always admired Joan Rivers. 


Joan entered American comedy during the 1960s, when stand-up and late-night television were overwhelmingly male worlds. She spent years performing in clubs before receiving a major break on The Tonight Show. She eventually became Johnny Carson's permanent guest host and, in 1986, became the first woman to host a late-night network television talk show. Think about the significance of that. A chair historically occupied by men suddenly had a woman sitting in it. That was a glass-ceiling moment. But Joan's career wasn't a straight line upward. Her late-night show ended. Professional relationships collapsed. She experienced rejection, criticism and periods when many people might have assumed her career was finished. Joan rebuilt again and again. She returned to television. She performed. She wrote. She reinvented herself for new audiences. And she continued working for decades.  


But what I admire most is that through all those reinventions, Joan remained unmistakably Joan. She was outspoken. She was sharp. She was fearless. She worked relentlessly. She took risks. She could laugh at herself. And she didn't ask permission to take up space. That was another ceiling she helped break. 


Women entering male-dominated spaces have historically been expected to adapt themselves to make everyone else comfortable. Be confident, but not intimidating. Be ambitious, but not too ambitious. Speak up, but don't be difficult. Lead, but make sure everyone still likes you.  


Joan refused to become smaller. That matters to me because I didn't build C2 by trying to become a female version of the men around me. I built it by understanding what I did well. I knew people. I built relationships. I trusted my instincts. And I refused to believe being different made me less capable.  


Joan showed that breaking through a glass ceiling doesn't mean very much if you have to leave your authentic self underneath it. 

Sheila Johnson: One Success Was Never Going to Be Enough 

Over time, my definition of success changed. At first, success meant survival. Then it meant getting another client. Then hiring an employee. Then getting an office. Then paying my parents back. Eventually, I realized that success wasn't one milestone. It was continuing to build. That is one of the reasons I admire Sheila Johnson. 


Sheila's professional story began far away from the hospitality empire people may associate with her today. She trained as a musician and worked as a music teacher before becoming an entrepreneur. In 1979, she co-founded Black Entertainment Television, or BET, helping build a television network created specifically for Black audiences at a time when both media ownership and corporate leadership offered very few seats at the table to Black women. BET grew into a major media company. That accomplishment alone represented an extraordinary ceiling being broken. Sheila was navigating barriers of both race and gender in an industry where the people controlling networks, investment and executive decisions rarely looked like her. 


But the part of Sheila's story that particularly inspires me is what happened afterward. She didn't decide that one enormous success was enough. She reinvented herself. She moved into hospitality and built Salamander Collection. She expanded her business interests into real estate, entertainment and professional sports ownership. She broke through one ceiling and then walked into another room and started breaking the next one. 


My connection to Sheila is also personal. Salamander Middleburg is close to where I live, and I frequent the property. I have many fond memories there. I've experienced what Sheila built not simply as another entrepreneur studying her career, but as a guest enjoying something another woman had the vision to create. I've also had the privilege of being a guest at her home in Tampa during the Global SOF conference. When I look at Salamander, I see more than a beautiful property. I see reinvention and I understand that instinct. C2 could have been the end of my entrepreneurial story but it wasn't. 


I also built Valorous, applying my experience to another part of the government, defense and intelligence world. There is courage in starting your first company. There is another kind of courage in having already succeeded and deciding you're still not finished.  That's what Sheila represents to me. She broke barriers in media, then hospitality, then sports ownership. Her career reminds me that a glass ceiling isn't always the end of the building. 


Sometimes you break through one floor only to discover how much higher you still want to climb. That's the difference between achieving success and building a legacy. 

Phebe Novakovic: A Woman at the Head of the Table 

There is something different about admiring a woman whose world overlaps with your own. For me, that woman is Phebe Novakovic. Before entering corporate leadership, Phebe built a career that included work in intelligence and senior positions within the federal government. She joined General Dynamics in 2001 and steadily rose through increasingly senior leadership positions before becoming chairman and CEO in 2013. 


That career means something very specific to me. Defense. Government. National security. Federal contracting. Those are worlds I understand. And historically, they have been overwhelmingly male worlds. 


When I was establishing my own career in government contracting in the late 1980s and early 1990s, I remember what those rooms looked like. I remember how few women were sitting at the head of the table. I remember being underestimated. Ignored. Talked over. I remember realizing that being good at my job wasn't always enough to be viewed as an equal. 


Phebe broke through that ceiling in an extraordinary way. She didn't simply find success in a traditionally male industry. 


She became one of the people leading it. 


Today, a woman sits at the top of one of America's largest aerospace and defense companies. That matters. I look to Phebe as a mentor from afar because representation becomes much more powerful when you see someone succeeding within an environment you personally understand. You know the culture. You know the personalities. You understand the pressures. You know how difficult those rooms can be. And then you see a woman sitting at the head of the table. It changes what you believe is possible. 


When I started my career, examples like that were much harder to find. Today, a young woman entering government contracting, defense or national security can look at Phebe and understand that there is no position within this industry that inherently belongs to a man. 


Women need those examples. I needed them. And I hope, in my own much smaller corner of this industry, another woman can look at what I've built and see another example. Because sometimes you never meet the women whose ambitions became a little bigger because they saw what you did first. 

CEO. Entrepreneur. Single Mother. 

Building a company is one accomplishment. Keeping it alive is another. C2 has lived through multiple recessions, economic uncertainty, tremendous changes in government contracting and a global pandemic. 


I've watched companies that once seemed permanent disappear yet C2 continued. That word, continued, means a lot to me. Longevity doesn't happen accidentally. You adapt. You make difficult decisions. You learn. You get things wrong. You fix them. And you keep moving. And while all of that was happening professionally, life wasn't waiting patiently on the sidelines. 


I raised two children as a single mother while running C2 and Valorous. There wasn't one version of me who was the CEO and another who was the mother. Both responsibilities came home with me. Employees depended on me. Clients depended on me. And, most importantly, my children depended on me. 


Women are often told that we can "have it all." I've always thought that phrase makes it sound much easier than it actually is. Sometimes having it all also means carrying it all. There are sacrifices. There are days when you're exhausted. There are business problems you're solving while simultaneously thinking about something one of your children needs. There are moments when you wonder whether you're giving enough to either side. 


But my children were never an obstacle to what I wanted to accomplish. They became part of why accomplishing it mattered. I wanted them to see perseverance. My parents had shown me what it looked like to believe in someone so completely that you were willing to bet your own future on them. 


I wanted my children to understand something similar. Circumstances don't get to decide your future for you. 

Malala Yousafzai: The Future Can Mentor Us Too 

And then there is Malala Yousafzai. Her story reminds me that the glass ceiling doesn't begin in a boardroom. For millions of women and girls around the world, the first ceiling can be far more fundamental. 


The right to learn. 


Malala grew up in Pakistan's Swat Valley and loved school. When the Taliban gained control of the region, girls increasingly lost access to education. Malala refused to quietly accept that future. While she was still a child, she began speaking publicly about girls' right to attend school. In 2012, when she was 15 years old, a Taliban gunman boarded her school bus and shot her in an attempt to silence her. 


She survived. And instead of becoming quieter, she became louder. Her voice became global. She continued advocating for girls' education around the world and, at 17, became the youngest Nobel Peace Prize laureate in history. Malala broke through perhaps the most fundamental glass ceiling of all: 


The belief that being born a girl should determine which opportunities you are allowed to have. 


Her story puts conversations about equality into perspective for me. I think about myself as a little girl hiding behind the classroom door because I was embarrassed to be seen in a different class. Then I think about girls around the world fighting simply for the right to walk through the classroom door. 


Those experiences are worlds apart, but the contrast makes me think deeply about education, opportunity and dignity. What I admire most about Malala isn't simply what she survived. It's what she chose to do afterward. She refused to allow the worst thing that happened to her to become the only thing that defined her. And she challenges another assumption I've had about mentorship. 


We tend to look backward for our mentors. Someone older. Someone more experienced. Someone who has already traveled the road. Malala makes me look forward. She reminds me that today's youth can mentor us too. Young women can challenge the assumptions we've carried for decades. They can ask why something still has to be done a certain way. They can refuse to accept compromises previous generations were forced to make. They can demand progress faster than we were taught to expect it. My generation has lessons to give the women coming behind us. But we also need the humility to understand that they have lessons to give us. 


Women should look backward and honor the women who opened doors for us. But we should also look forward. The woman who inspires you next may not be older than you. She may be young enough to be your daughter. 

Breaking Through Is No Longer Enough 

When I was younger, breaking the glass ceiling meant proving I belonged. I wanted to prove that dyslexia didn't determine my intelligence. That not finishing college didn't determine the height of my career. That being a woman didn't determine whether my voice mattered. That starting without wealth didn't determine whether I could become an entrepreneur. That being a single mother didn't mean I had to choose between being there for my children and continuing to build the companies I had created. 


I spent years proving those things. At this stage of my life, I don't feel the same need to prove that I belong in the room. I've spent decades in the room. Now I'm much more interested in the woman walking into it after me. That is what Women's Equality Day means to me today. The women I admire didn't simply achieve impressive things. Each one expanded what another woman could imagine for herself. 


Barbara Corcoran reminds a dyslexic girl struggling in school that she may think differently, but that doesn't mean she should dream smaller. 


Barabra Walters reminds a young woman finding her voice that credibility and authority don't belong to one gender. 


Joan Rivers reminds women that they shouldn't have to erase themselves to succeed in spaces that weren't built for them. 


Sheila Johnson shows that breaking one barrier doesn't mean you've reached the boundary of your ambition. 


Phebe Novakovic reminds women that no corner of the defense industry is too powerful, too established or too traditionally male for a woman to lead 


And Malala reminds all of us that the next generation isn't simply waiting for us to teach them. They are already teaching us. 


Every woman who breaks a ceiling leaves a crack behind. Every woman who walks through makes the opening a little wider. And every woman who reaches the other side has a decision to make. Do we simply celebrate that we made it? Or do we turn around and make it easier for the next woman? I've spent much of my life breaking ceilings. Now I believe my responsibility is different. I want to help remove them. Because the greatest measure of progress won't be how many women become exceptionally good at breaking through glass ceilings. 


It will be whether, someday, the women coming behind us look up and discover that the ceiling is no longer there. That is the legacy I want to leave. And that is what Women's Equality Day means to me. 

Read more

What a Shark, a Comedian and a Nobel Laureate Taught Me About Breaking Barriers

When people talk about breaking the glass ceiling, they often focus on the moment someone finally breaks through. The promotion. The title. The company. The accomplishment. What we don't talk about enough are all the moments that come before it. 


The moments when you're told you aren't qualified enough. When you're the only woman in the room. When someone speaks over you. When you're underestimated. When you watch an opportunity go to someone else because you don't have the right degree or background. When you begin wondering whether the things that make you different are going to keep you from becoming the person you know you can be. I know those moments because I lived them. 


And when I think about Women's Equality Day, I think not only about my own journey, but about the women whose stories have influenced me along the way. Some came before me. Some built their careers alongside my generation. And one is young enough to remind me that inspiration and mentorship don't always come from those who are older than us. They are entrepreneurs, journalists, entertainers, executives and advocates. Their lives could hardly be more different. 


But every one of them encountered a ceiling that told her, in one way or another, this is as far as you are supposed to go. And every one of them kept going and so did I. 

The Girl Hiding Behind the Door 

I grew up in a military family without much money. My father's career as an Army Infantry officer meant our family moved around the world, usually every few years. I was born in Georgia while he was stationed at Fort Benning, and moving became a normal part of childhood. 


Long before I knew what adaptability meant in business, I learned it through life. New schools. New communities. New countries. New people. Every few years, I had to learn how to walk into an unfamiliar environment and find my place. That ability to adapt would eventually become one of my greatest strengths in business. 


But there was another part of my childhood that took much longer to understand. School was difficult for me. This was during a time when children who learned differently weren't necessarily given the understanding or resources available today. I struggled academically and was separated from the other students and sent to another classroom. 


I remember being so embarrassed about being placed with the "slow kids" that I would hide behind the door because I didn't want the other children to see that I was in there. Think about what that teaches a little girl. Before you even understand why you're different, you begin believing that being different is something you should hide. 


For years, I didn't have an explanation for why certain things were harder for me. I simply believed I wasn't as good at them as everyone else. It wasn't until I was around 30, after a family member was diagnosed with dyslexia, that I decided to be evaluated myself. I was dyslexic. Suddenly, so much of my childhood made sense. But something else had happened during all those years when I didn't know. 


I adapted. I learned how to compensate for the things that were difficult by becoming exceptionally good at other things. I learned to remember information. I learned to read people. I learned to communicate. I learned to build relationships. I learned how to understand what someone needed, sometimes before they knew how to articulate it themselves. The thing I had once believed was holding me back had forced me to develop some of the exact abilities that would eventually make me successful in human resources and business. 

Barbara Corcoran: What School Couldn’t Measure 

That's one of the reasons I have always felt such a strong connection to Barbara Corcoran. 


Millions of people know Barbara today as one of the original investors on Shark Tank. They see a confident entrepreneur evaluating businesses and deciding which founders deserve her investment. But Barbara's story didn't begin in a boardroom. 


She has spoken openly about struggling academically because of dyslexia. She moved through numerous jobs as a young woman before eventually finding her place in real estate. With a $1,000 loan, Barbara started a tiny real estate company in New York City. That business eventually became The Corcoran Group, one of the best-known names in New York real estate. She would later sell the company and build another chapter of her career as an investor, author and television personality. 


What Barbara broke through wasn't simply the traditional glass ceiling facing women in business. She also broke through assumptions about what intelligence and potential are supposed to look like. For someone who grew up with dyslexia, that means something to me. When you struggle in school, it can be very easy to confuse learning differently with being less capable. I spent part of my childhood believing that. 


Barbara's story demonstrates the opposite. She figured out what she did exceptionally well and built around those strengths. So did I. Our careers and businesses are very different, but I recognize something in her journey. 


Neither of us followed the traditional roadmap people associate with becoming successful businesswomen. Neither of us allowed dyslexia to write the ending of our stories. And both of us ultimately built companies from very humble beginnings. 


Barbara broke a glass ceiling by proving that the girl who struggled in the classroom could eventually become the woman sitting on the other side of the table investing in other people's dreams. Sometimes the first ceiling you have to break is the one the world taught you to place over yourself. 

Finding the Work That Fit Me 

My career didn't follow a straight line either. I didn't complete college. I originally thought I might become a pediatric nurse because I loved children and helping people. But academics continued to be difficult, particularly in areas like math and chemistry, and eventually I changed direction. 


Like a lot of young people, I moved between possibilities before realizing where I belonged. That place was human resources. I had actually gotten an early glimpse of HR while my family was stationed in Germany. During a summer job in the Civilian Personnel Office, I watched a woman who genuinely loved helping people solve problems. I remember the joy she got from her work. People would walk in with problems, and she wanted to help fix them. I could see myself doing that. 


Eventually, I found my way back to HR professionally and into the government contracting world. And I discovered that I was good at it. I understood people. I built relationships. People trusted me. I could walk into different environments and adapt, something I had been practicing without realizing it since childhood. But being good at your job and being allowed to advance weren't always the same thing. I was told I was talented,  was told I did great work. But I was also told that because I didn't have a college degree, there were positions I couldn't reach. 


Then there was another reality. I was a woman building a career in the government contracting world of the late 1980s and early 1990s. It was overwhelmingly male. I knew what it felt like to be underestimated. I knew what it was like not to have a voice. I was ignored. I was talked over. I was excluded. 


There were rooms where you understood very quickly that some of the men around the table did not necessarily see you as their equal. I began to understand that there really was a glass ceiling above me. But there was another message I had grown up hearing that eventually became part of how I approached business and life: 


Failure is not an option. 


If someone else had already decided how high I was allowed to go, perhaps I needed to stop asking for permission to go higher. 

Barbara Walters: A Voice That Changed Who Got to Ask the Questions 

During those years, women like Barbara Walters mattered to me. Today, it is easy to turn on the television and see women anchoring major news programs, interviewing presidents and leading conversations about politics, culture and world events. 


That was not always the case. Barbara Walters built her career in an era when broadcast journalism, particularly its most prestigious positions, was overwhelmingly controlled by men. She began working behind the scenes in television before joining NBC's Today show in the early 1960s. Even as her role grew, women in television news were often expected to cover lighter stories while their male colleagues were given the most serious assignments.  


Barbara kept pushing beyond those expectations. She became the first female co-host of Today. Then, in 1976, she made television history when she joined ABC Evening News and became the first woman to co-anchor a network evening news program. Later, she became a longtime presence on 20/20 and, in 1997, created The View, building a program around women having direct, sometimes difficult conversations about the issues of the day. 


Over the course of her career, Barbara interviewed presidents, heads of state, celebrities and some of the most recognizable figures in the world. Her ability to secure important interviews became one of the defining characteristics of her career. But what I admired most wasn't simply who she interviewed. It was the authority she earned to ask the questions. For generations, the person sitting across from a president, a world leader or another powerful figure was usually a man. 


Barbara changed that image. She demonstrated that a woman could control the conversation. She could be persistent. She could challenge someone powerful. She could ask an uncomfortable question and wait for the answer. And she could do all of it without becoming someone else in order to be taken seriously. 


Most importantly to me, people trusted her. That was the part of Barbara's career that stayed with me. I was learning professionally that having something valuable to contribute didn't necessarily mean someone would automatically give me the opportunity to contribute it. Barbara's career demonstrated something different: authority doesn't always have to be given to you. Sometimes you build it until people can no longer ignore it. 


And she did more than break through for herself. By becoming the first woman to co-anchor   network evening newscast, she changed what millions of Americans saw when they imagined a person with authority. Later, with The View, she helped create a table specifically built around women having opinions, disagreeing, asking questions and shaping conversations themselves. There is something important about that progression. 


Early in our careers, so much of our energy can be spent trying to prove that we deserve a seat at someone else's table. Eventually, leadership becomes about creating a bigger table. Looking back, I think that is one of the lessons I took from Barbara without fully realizing it at the time. I was reaching a point in my own career where I had demonstrated what I could do. I knew I was good at my work. I knew I understood people. I knew I understood government contractors. And I was beginning to recognize an opportunity that other people weren't seeing.  


The question was whether I was going to continue waiting for someone else to decide what I was qualified to do. Or whether I was finally going to decide for myself. 

When I Stopped Waiting for Permission 

As my career progressed, I started noticing an opportunity. I was working in HR for government contractors and developing relationships throughout the federal contracting community. Small businesses were competing for significant government work, but many didn't have the internal infrastructure of the larger companies they were competing against. They needed sophisticated HR support, but many couldn't justify building entire HR departments. 


There was a gap. And I couldn't stop thinking about it. 


Eventually, I went to the Library of Congress to research an idea I genuinely thought I had invented. What if one organization could provide these businesses with the HR infrastructure and services they needed? Then I discovered something slightly humbling. I hadn't invented it. The PEO model already existed. But what I had identified was still important. The model wasn't being widely used to serve the Washington-area federal contracting community in the way I envisioned. So instead of being discouraged that someone had gotten there first, I started asking a different question: 


Why couldn't I be the one to bring it to the market I knew? 


In 1996, at 32 years old, I started C2. There was no beautiful corporate headquarters. There wasn't a large staff waiting for me. There wasn't a giant pool of investment capital. 


There was my townhouse. There was me. And there were my parents. 


My parents weren't wealthy investors. After my father retired from the military, they invested their retirement money into a chicken farm. When I needed funding to start my company, they took a loan against that farm and gave me $100,000. I agreed to repay every dollar with interest. 


I remember asking my father what would happen if I failed. The answer, underneath a joke about him and my mother having to walk chickens for the rest of their lives, was the same message he had taught me throughout my life. Failure wasn't an option. So I got to work. 


When I say I ran the company, I mean I ran the company. HR, payroll, accounting, sales, client relationships, research, and operations. If something needed to happen, there wasn't another department I could send it to, I was the department. 


Entrepreneurship looks very different when you're living through it than it does when someone tells the success story decades later. The beginning wasn't glamorous. It was long hours, uncertainty, responsibility, and knowing my parents had put their own financial security behind their belief in me. 


But slowly, the things I had imagined started becoming real. I hired my first employee. We added clients. We hired more people. And eventually, C2 had an office. I remember what that represented to me. I could physically walk through a door and see what all of those years of work had created. C2 wasn't an idea being run out of my basement anymore. It was a company. And one of the accomplishments that meant the most to me had nothing to do with an award or title. 


It was that I paid my parents back every dollar including the interest. 

Joan Rivers: Never Make Yourself Smaller  

As C2 grew, I faced a different challenge. Starting a company is one thing. Deciding what kind of leader you're going to become is another. That is one of the reasons I have always admired Joan Rivers. 


Joan entered American comedy during the 1960s, when stand-up and late-night television were overwhelmingly male worlds. She spent years performing in clubs before receiving a major break on The Tonight Show. She eventually became Johnny Carson's permanent guest host and, in 1986, became the first woman to host a late-night network television talk show. Think about the significance of that. A chair historically occupied by men suddenly had a woman sitting in it. That was a glass-ceiling moment. But Joan's career wasn't a straight line upward. Her late-night show ended. Professional relationships collapsed. She experienced rejection, criticism and periods when many people might have assumed her career was finished. Joan rebuilt again and again. She returned to television. She performed. She wrote. She reinvented herself for new audiences. And she continued working for decades.  


But what I admire most is that through all those reinventions, Joan remained unmistakably Joan. She was outspoken. She was sharp. She was fearless. She worked relentlessly. She took risks. She could laugh at herself. And she didn't ask permission to take up space. That was another ceiling she helped break. 


Women entering male-dominated spaces have historically been expected to adapt themselves to make everyone else comfortable. Be confident, but not intimidating. Be ambitious, but not too ambitious. Speak up, but don't be difficult. Lead, but make sure everyone still likes you.  


Joan refused to become smaller. That matters to me because I didn't build C2 by trying to become a female version of the men around me. I built it by understanding what I did well. I knew people. I built relationships. I trusted my instincts. And I refused to believe being different made me less capable.  


Joan showed that breaking through a glass ceiling doesn't mean very much if you have to leave your authentic self underneath it. 

Sheila Johnson: One Success Was Never Going to Be Enough 

Over time, my definition of success changed. At first, success meant survival. Then it meant getting another client. Then hiring an employee. Then getting an office. Then paying my parents back. Eventually, I realized that success wasn't one milestone. It was continuing to build. That is one of the reasons I admire Sheila Johnson. 


Sheila's professional story began far away from the hospitality empire people may associate with her today. She trained as a musician and worked as a music teacher before becoming an entrepreneur. In 1979, she co-founded Black Entertainment Television, or BET, helping build a television network created specifically for Black audiences at a time when both media ownership and corporate leadership offered very few seats at the table to Black women. BET grew into a major media company. That accomplishment alone represented an extraordinary ceiling being broken. Sheila was navigating barriers of both race and gender in an industry where the people controlling networks, investment and executive decisions rarely looked like her. 


But the part of Sheila's story that particularly inspires me is what happened afterward. She didn't decide that one enormous success was enough. She reinvented herself. She moved into hospitality and built Salamander Collection. She expanded her business interests into real estate, entertainment and professional sports ownership. She broke through one ceiling and then walked into another room and started breaking the next one. 


My connection to Sheila is also personal. Salamander Middleburg is close to where I live, and I frequent the property. I have many fond memories there. I've experienced what Sheila built not simply as another entrepreneur studying her career, but as a guest enjoying something another woman had the vision to create. I've also had the privilege of being a guest at her home in Tampa during the Global SOF conference. When I look at Salamander, I see more than a beautiful property. I see reinvention and I understand that instinct. C2 could have been the end of my entrepreneurial story but it wasn't. 


I also built Valorous, applying my experience to another part of the government, defense and intelligence world. There is courage in starting your first company. There is another kind of courage in having already succeeded and deciding you're still not finished.  That's what Sheila represents to me. She broke barriers in media, then hospitality, then sports ownership. Her career reminds me that a glass ceiling isn't always the end of the building. 


Sometimes you break through one floor only to discover how much higher you still want to climb. That's the difference between achieving success and building a legacy. 

Phebe Novakovic: A Woman at the Head of the Table 

There is something different about admiring a woman whose world overlaps with your own. For me, that woman is Phebe Novakovic. Before entering corporate leadership, Phebe built a career that included work in intelligence and senior positions within the federal government. She joined General Dynamics in 2001 and steadily rose through increasingly senior leadership positions before becoming chairman and CEO in 2013. 


That career means something very specific to me. Defense. Government. National security. Federal contracting. Those are worlds I understand. And historically, they have been overwhelmingly male worlds. 


When I was establishing my own career in government contracting in the late 1980s and early 1990s, I remember what those rooms looked like. I remember how few women were sitting at the head of the table. I remember being underestimated. Ignored. Talked over. I remember realizing that being good at my job wasn't always enough to be viewed as an equal. 


Phebe broke through that ceiling in an extraordinary way. She didn't simply find success in a traditionally male industry. 


She became one of the people leading it. 


Today, a woman sits at the top of one of America's largest aerospace and defense companies. That matters. I look to Phebe as a mentor from afar because representation becomes much more powerful when you see someone succeeding within an environment you personally understand. You know the culture. You know the personalities. You understand the pressures. You know how difficult those rooms can be. And then you see a woman sitting at the head of the table. It changes what you believe is possible. 


When I started my career, examples like that were much harder to find. Today, a young woman entering government contracting, defense or national security can look at Phebe and understand that there is no position within this industry that inherently belongs to a man. 


Women need those examples. I needed them. And I hope, in my own much smaller corner of this industry, another woman can look at what I've built and see another example. Because sometimes you never meet the women whose ambitions became a little bigger because they saw what you did first. 

CEO. Entrepreneur. Single Mother. 

Building a company is one accomplishment. Keeping it alive is another. C2 has lived through multiple recessions, economic uncertainty, tremendous changes in government contracting and a global pandemic. 


I've watched companies that once seemed permanent disappear yet C2 continued. That word, continued, means a lot to me. Longevity doesn't happen accidentally. You adapt. You make difficult decisions. You learn. You get things wrong. You fix them. And you keep moving. And while all of that was happening professionally, life wasn't waiting patiently on the sidelines. 


I raised two children as a single mother while running C2 and Valorous. There wasn't one version of me who was the CEO and another who was the mother. Both responsibilities came home with me. Employees depended on me. Clients depended on me. And, most importantly, my children depended on me. 


Women are often told that we can "have it all." I've always thought that phrase makes it sound much easier than it actually is. Sometimes having it all also means carrying it all. There are sacrifices. There are days when you're exhausted. There are business problems you're solving while simultaneously thinking about something one of your children needs. There are moments when you wonder whether you're giving enough to either side. 


But my children were never an obstacle to what I wanted to accomplish. They became part of why accomplishing it mattered. I wanted them to see perseverance. My parents had shown me what it looked like to believe in someone so completely that you were willing to bet your own future on them. 


I wanted my children to understand something similar. Circumstances don't get to decide your future for you. 

Malala Yousafzai: The Future Can Mentor Us Too 

And then there is Malala Yousafzai. Her story reminds me that the glass ceiling doesn't begin in a boardroom. For millions of women and girls around the world, the first ceiling can be far more fundamental. 


The right to learn. 


Malala grew up in Pakistan's Swat Valley and loved school. When the Taliban gained control of the region, girls increasingly lost access to education. Malala refused to quietly accept that future. While she was still a child, she began speaking publicly about girls' right to attend school. In 2012, when she was 15 years old, a Taliban gunman boarded her school bus and shot her in an attempt to silence her. 


She survived. And instead of becoming quieter, she became louder. Her voice became global. She continued advocating for girls' education around the world and, at 17, became the youngest Nobel Peace Prize laureate in history. Malala broke through perhaps the most fundamental glass ceiling of all: 


The belief that being born a girl should determine which opportunities you are allowed to have. 


Her story puts conversations about equality into perspective for me. I think about myself as a little girl hiding behind the classroom door because I was embarrassed to be seen in a different class. Then I think about girls around the world fighting simply for the right to walk through the classroom door. 


Those experiences are worlds apart, but the contrast makes me think deeply about education, opportunity and dignity. What I admire most about Malala isn't simply what she survived. It's what she chose to do afterward. She refused to allow the worst thing that happened to her to become the only thing that defined her. And she challenges another assumption I've had about mentorship. 


We tend to look backward for our mentors. Someone older. Someone more experienced. Someone who has already traveled the road. Malala makes me look forward. She reminds me that today's youth can mentor us too. Young women can challenge the assumptions we've carried for decades. They can ask why something still has to be done a certain way. They can refuse to accept compromises previous generations were forced to make. They can demand progress faster than we were taught to expect it. My generation has lessons to give the women coming behind us. But we also need the humility to understand that they have lessons to give us. 


Women should look backward and honor the women who opened doors for us. But we should also look forward. The woman who inspires you next may not be older than you. She may be young enough to be your daughter. 

Breaking Through Is No Longer Enough 

When I was younger, breaking the glass ceiling meant proving I belonged. I wanted to prove that dyslexia didn't determine my intelligence. That not finishing college didn't determine the height of my career. That being a woman didn't determine whether my voice mattered. That starting without wealth didn't determine whether I could become an entrepreneur. That being a single mother didn't mean I had to choose between being there for my children and continuing to build the companies I had created. 


I spent years proving those things. At this stage of my life, I don't feel the same need to prove that I belong in the room. I've spent decades in the room. Now I'm much more interested in the woman walking into it after me. That is what Women's Equality Day means to me today. The women I admire didn't simply achieve impressive things. Each one expanded what another woman could imagine for herself. 


Barbara Corcoran reminds a dyslexic girl struggling in school that she may think differently, but that doesn't mean she should dream smaller. 


Barabra Walters reminds a young woman finding her voice that credibility and authority don't belong to one gender. 


Joan Rivers reminds women that they shouldn't have to erase themselves to succeed in spaces that weren't built for them. 


Sheila Johnson shows that breaking one barrier doesn't mean you've reached the boundary of your ambition. 


Phebe Novakovic reminds women that no corner of the defense industry is too powerful, too established or too traditionally male for a woman to lead 


And Malala reminds all of us that the next generation isn't simply waiting for us to teach them. They are already teaching us. 


Every woman who breaks a ceiling leaves a crack behind. Every woman who walks through makes the opening a little wider. And every woman who reaches the other side has a decision to make. Do we simply celebrate that we made it? Or do we turn around and make it easier for the next woman? I've spent much of my life breaking ceilings. Now I believe my responsibility is different. I want to help remove them. Because the greatest measure of progress won't be how many women become exceptionally good at breaking through glass ceilings. 


It will be whether, someday, the women coming behind us look up and discover that the ceiling is no longer there. That is the legacy I want to leave. And that is what Women's Equality Day means to me. 

Read more

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What’s the difference between a PEO and an ASO?

Do I lose control of my employees under a PEO arrangement?

Can C2 help with government contractor compliance?

Is the HR platform included with your services?

What size businesses does C2 work with?

C2 Essentials logo

© 2026 C2 Essentials, All Rights Reserved

We handle payroll, benefits, compliance and risk so you can focus on your business.

C2 Essentials logo

© 2026 C2 Essentials, All Rights Reserved

We handle payroll, benefits, compliance and risk so you can focus on your business.

C2 Essentials logo

© 2026 C2 Essentials, All Rights Reserved

We handle payroll, benefits, compliance and risk so you can focus on your business.

C2 Essentials logo

© 2026 C2 Essentials, All Rights Reserved

We handle payroll, benefits, compliance and risk so you can focus on your business.